Pharma & Biotech

Enamine

AI-driven in-silico drug discovery for molecule library

$1M+

Estimated R&D cost savings

99.99%

Reduction in search space – narrowed from 36 billion molecules to just 10,000 top candidates

3–6 months

Time saved in hit identification

Case Studies

Accelerating hit identification with machine learning and virtual screening

See Testimonial

Biotech

Industry

USA

Location

Drug discovery, AI compound screening, chemical space optimization

Services

The team showed initiative and proactiveness in developing alternative solutions to reach our goals. As a result, we obtained very complex and high-quality support.

Under NDA

CEO, Chemistry Solutions Company
Challenge

Enamine, a global leader in compound libraries, needed a faster, scalable alternative to high-throughput screening (HTS) for early-stage drug discovery.

See what we can do for you
Outcomes We Deliver

Solution

The system combined machine learning–based affinity prediction, large-scale virtual screening, and docking simulations (DiffDock) with active learning loops. This allowed scalable identification and prioritization of high-potential ligands while drastically reducing the need for costly wet-lab experiments.

Let’s talk about what’s possible
Dalriada
Tech Stack

To develop a scalable AI-driven pipeline, Blackthorn AI applied:

Python
RDKit
Seaborn
Docker
Roadmap

Project duration

01 Week

Data ingestion & prep

Integrated 20K labeled molecules (hits, non-binders); accessed 36B Enamine REAL DB via FTP tranches and parsed bz2 files for enumeration.

02 Week

Affinity model training

Trained ML model to predict ligand-target binding affinity. Validated results against HTS-confirmed hits and selective binders.

03 Week

Large-scale screening

Scored billions of molecules; selected top 100K candidates with highest predicted affinity. Prepped inputs for docking.

04 Week

Docking & export

Ran DiffDock on 1M+ ligands. Mapped binding pocket coverage and exported top 10K hits for lab validation and downstream FEP modeling.

Team Size

4 Qualified Experts
1 x Lead AI Scientist
1 x Computational Chemist
1 x Data Engineer
1 x Project Manager

Delivering Impact

99.99%

Reduction in search space

Narrowed from 36 billion molecules to just 10,000 top candidates

$10M+

Estimated R&D cost savings

Avoided synthesis/screening of millions of compounds (avg. $500–$1,000 per compound)

6–12

Months saved

Hit ID accelerated from year-long HTS workflows to <8 weeks

>80%

Fewer wet-lab experiments required

Lab work focused on just 0.0003% of initial chemical space

Discover More Related Case Studies